Hundreds of hectares, multiple sites. And a headquarters coordinating by guesswork.
Multi-site technical management, group-level outgrower schemes, donor compliance: Amaya structures the management of plantations looking to industrialize their technical supervision.
Speak with an Amaya executive
Three field challenges
1. Technical supervision dilutes over distance
What is decided at headquarters doesn’t always reach the plots. What happens on the plots doesn’t always reach headquarters. Without a shared tool, coordination relies on emails and mission reports.
2. The outgrower scheme lives in a spreadsheet
Multiple versions, obsolete data, group reporting to rebuild every quarter. The information exists, but it’s not actionable in real time.
3. Stakeholders expect data
Compliance, traceability, environmental KPIs: the documentation exists somewhere in the field, but not in a structured and exportable format.
Use Cases
| Challenge | Amaya Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Multi-site technical coordination | Amaya Advisor for tracking visits and recommendations by site |
| Digitized outgrower scheme | Outgrower registry, plots, history, group consolidation |
| Automated donor reporting | Real-time export of traceability and compliance data |
| ERP Integration | REST API, SAP connectors |
| Multi-country standardization | Country-specific configuration, multi-language, local support |
FAQ
SAP Integration?
Yes, via APIs.
Multi-country deployment?
Country-specific configuration (language, currency, crops, campaign calendar). Group consolidation.
Field team training?
Cluster-based training, locally, in the team’s language. Adoption in weeks.
Your plantations deserve management that doesn’t rely on the site director’s last email. 30 minutes to discuss.
Speak with an Amaya executiveReady to structure your field data?
Move from Excel to real data. A 30-minute chat to evaluate if Amaya is the right lever for your next campaign.
The B2B agritech SaaS structuring data flows between the field and headquarters in Africa.
contact@amaya.ag